Nutrition †Food Essay

In our today’s society, particularly western nations, the issue of cheap food is by all accounts at the highest point of each wellbeing related discussion. As these discussions become progressively dubious, the subject of who bears the obligation stays unanswered. In his paper, Don’t Blame the Eater, David Zinczenko endeavors to respond to this key inquiry by putting the more noteworthy duty of America’s weight and other inexpensive food related medical problems on the cheap food ventures. In spite of Zinczenko’s contention, Raldy Balko, in his exposition, What You Eat Is Your Business, expresses that, individuals should take responsibility for wellbeing and prosperity, and are thusly answerable for what and how they eat. Albeit both Zinczenko and Balko address the issue of duty, however with differentiate, yet legitimate contentions, Zinczenko appears to introduce an all the more persuading contention because of the manner by which he clarifies the governmental issues of food, the manner by which our ways of life are adjusted by what we eat, and things we can do to change the manner in which we see food and its job in our lives. In spite of the fact that Zinczenko consider buyers capable to a degree, he accuses the inexpensive food ventures for the increasing pace of heftiness and other medical problems identified with cheap food because of their inability to give marks to their items. Zinczenko convincingly underpins his case by taking note of factual information that shows the ascent in cash spent to treat diabetes. â€Å"Before 1994, diabetes in youngsters was for the most part brought about by a hereditary issue just 5 percent of youth cases were heftiness related, or Type 2 diabetes. Today, as indicated by the National Institutes of Health, Type 2 diabetes represents in any event 30 percent of all new youth instances of diabetes in this country†(Zinczenko 392). He contends that, if the inexpensive food organizations are managed with the goal that they are answerable for their food substance, by giving appropriate marks, than customers will settle on educated food decisions. In spite of Zinczenko, Balko contends that what one eats ought to involve moral duty. To Balko’s credit, I accept that individuals should assume individual liability for their wellbeing by including a reasonable eating routine and exercise to their schedules. Where I vary from Balko is the point at which he says that administration limitations on food are an aftereffect of individuals settling on helpless food decisions. As per Balko, â€Å"a society where everybody is liable for everybody else’s prosperity is a general public progressively well-suited to acknowledge government restrictions† (397). I think Balko’s contention in such manner, is an egotistical one, and is an endeavor to absolve the rich from paying a considerable amount of duties that would some way or another advantage poor people or some center families who can't manage the cost of the significant expense of medical coverage. Both Zinczenko and Balko appear to concur on the rising wellbeing costs that are by one way or another a consequence of inexpensive food, these two creators appear to vary on reasons. Zinczenko contends that medicinal services cost is on the ascent on account of infections brought about by inexpensive food because of the disappointment of cheap food organizations to give marks and that purchasers ought not be fault for it. Nonetheless, Balko contends that it is so that, we permit the â€Å"government to interfere with us and our waistline† (396). Balko states that, the more the administration keeps on financing medical problems that are immediate property of helpless food/wellbeing decisions, the more individuals will keep on feasting on cheap food and draw in not in a successful eating regimen and exercise routine. (398) The development of the cheap food industry and the rate at which inexpensive food is devoured is so quick, and its going with dangers of stoutness and related cardiovascular ailments have gotten a cultural plague. Zinczenko accuses the cheap food businesses for the spring in the rate to which corpulence have developed in the United States. Despite the fact that Zinczenko is directly about the increasing pace of stoutness, and that the utilization of cheap food shapes some portion of its etiology, the proposal of his contention can't be demonstrated and thusly can't frame the reason for his cases against the inexpensive food organizations since there are other contributing elements with respect to the reason, beginning, and movement of heftiness. Stoutness is likewise organically connected. These organic attributors include: hereditary qualities, hormones, proteins, and nutrients and minerals. A few people have fat in their qualities that, regardless of what they do, they are simply fat. Others have issues with hormonal irregular characteristics or potentially deficient enzymatic activities that would help in the sufficient processing and ingestion of specific nourishments. Cheap food is only one of the numerous natural traits related with heftiness. So Zinczenko can precisely present his defense against the inexpensive food businesses for giving names in order to empower customers settle on educated food decisions and not an instance of corpulence. At times, individuals are too quick to even consider passing judgment on others, particularly individuals that are large. I am similarly liable of the allegation myself. I fill in as an attendant at a nursing home office and, as a rule, when staff part comes to me whining of migraine, first thing I state to them is; let’s check your circulatory strain and, God prohibit, the pulse is raised, or if that individual simply look fat to me, my next remark is, it is a result of all the garbage you eat. My judgment, however might be mistaken, depends on the way that a large portion of these staff individuals are single guardians, live in downtowns, and have an absolute drive time of two hours to and from work. Also, some of them have more than one occupation. Be that as it may, these individuals are being caused to feel liable about something that is absolutely out their control. In many examples, their wages aren’t sufficiently even to get together with their rents and utilities bills. Inexpensive food comes convenient in such occasion where one can burn through ten dollars and get ten cheeseburgers to take care of a group of three to five as opposed to setting off to the market where each solid fixing is practically proportionate to the cost of the whole supper containing cheap food. Individuals count on inexpensive food since it is modest. Zinczenko clarifies that his folks were separated and that he needed to live with his mom who worked extended periods of time just to make the month to month bills. â€Å"Lunch and supper, for me, was an every day decision between McDonald’s, Taco Bell, Kentucky Fried Chicken or Pizza Hut. † (Zinczenko 391). In Zinczenko’s case, his way of life is changed in light of the fact that cheap food is his solitary alternative since his family is useless. His single parent needs to strive to take care of tabs and give him a feast. It doesn’t matter the sort of dinner. A supper is a dinner, particularly for somebody who doesn’t have the opportunity to set up a home prepared feast. The individuals beset with cheap food related heftiness are not to fault for what they eat on the grounds that they have next to no or no alternatives in regards to what they eat because of the entirety of the above reasons. In any case, to Balko’s point, while individuals might not have the choice about what they eat, they have the choice to control how they eat. Zinczenko states in his exposition that cheap food is â€Å"the just accessible alternatives for an American child to get a moderate meal†, thus, he asks his perusers not to â€Å"blame the Eater† (392). However, as with Zinczenko, we are very much aware of the job cheap food play in our lives. We get that, however quick might be one, or the main accessible supper decision that we have, the manner in which we eat can assist us with deciding the job these nourishments play in our lives. Zinczenko bolsters his contention about the job food play in his life by giving data about his pre-school weight. â€Å"By age 15, I had pressed 212 pounds of lethargic fat on my once slender 5-foot-10 frame† (392). Indeed, even Zinczenko accepts that, customers are as similarly liable for the manner in which they eat. Nonetheless, he keeps up his contention that the inexpensive food organizations exposed the more noteworthy duty. All in all, both the eater and the maker are liable for inexpensive food related weight, however I accept that the quick ventures should uncovered the more prominent obligation. Cheap food organizations must give their purchasers appropriate food marks that empower them to settle on educate choice about what they eat. Name ought not be misrepresented or misdirecting, as in the model giving by Zinczenko about the deceptive mark on the â€Å"chicken salad† (393). He alludes to the plate of mixed greens as not beneficial and that it is a caloric passing snare focused on eaters who won't suspect it. In spite of the fact that Balko makes some great focuses, his targets appear to me as an unfortunate chore. Zinczenko alerts that there are not many or no options in contrast to what we eat and that things need to change. Balko alerts that permitting food guidelines for marks implies letting the legislature among you and your waistline. In either case, we as a people have an obligation to consider what and how we eat.

Identify the different Types of Charters available to contract a Assignment

Recognize the various Types of Charters accessible to get a vessel, and quickly clarify the notable highlights of the various Types of Charters distinguished above - Assignment Example rouping of agreement, an exposed pontoon sanction, the vessel proprietor leases the flawless stage, and the charterer has the risk of in administration it as despite the fact that it were his have transport. As the name involves, the exposed boat is contracted. The vessel owner has discard impact of the vessel in hold up of the stage along with this through the contract gathering.2 The charterer pays the unblemished working consumption oil, supplies, necessities, port duty, pilot age, etc, just as utilizes and pays the group. However, there perhaps will be a portion in the agreement assembling that is the ace and the pioneer engineer must be acknowledged by methods for the vessel owner. Gathering is a normal marine articulation and is indistinguishable by methods for understanding or agreement. 3 Agreement and sanction are various types of understanding arrangement task decisions which a provider offers. Client holds out vessel; client capacities plan undertakings. Abnormally a subsequent client offers vessel; clients takes out providers groups program assignments and capacities. Contractual worker performs plan assignments decisions temporary worker offers. Client performs vessel and capacities plans missions it. Contractual worker accomplishes program turnkey.4 The charterer is responsible for the continuation, protection, and security of the vessel. Past to discharge to the charterer, the boat is reviewed through delegates of commonly get-togethers and the comparable is set up on redelivery. The agreements parties’ will specify that the boat must be redelivered in the comparable top notch course of action and circumstance as moved, by methods for exception of regular convey and shared. Contractual worker capacities transport offers through client decisions and are c ontrasts by methods for the specific separation being that the client, around altogether the concentrated government, has offered the vessel. There are various fluctuated explanations behind this comprehension. One is a final product of greatness from office of the board and

Ge: Five Force Analysis of Case Study Essay

The danger of new passage of the firm is to some degree little on the grounds that the firm is the huge organization with long and concentrated understanding. It is trouble for new section to finish with existing items and administrations which need a lot of venture and cost so as to maintain the business and build up the items and administrations. It is hard for the new passage since GE has a solid brand and notoriety just as licenses and skill that has the new section is impossible in the brief time frame so as to rival GE and other significant rivals in this industry. The intensity of purchasers The bartering intensity of the purchasers is high. This is on the grounds that, the very high of changing expense from contenders, for example, innovation industry where the purchasers can discover the data effectively which will affects them so as to settle on a choice to buying the items. It would profit of the firm on the off chance that they can sell a huge volume of items. In any case, there are not all of organizations in GE that have positive effect from exchanging cost of purchasing. The intensity of provider The firm will in general make long haul relationship with providers and a large portion of them are cooperate in vital union by sharing the information and innovation. With this relationship, it is win-win circumstance that GE and their providers will get. In this way, the haggling intensity of provider isn't high since they have gotten interconnected in term of information and innovation. Consequently, the providers need to accept this open door to assemble the relationship with the firm so as to rival their business. The dangers of substitutes The firm needs to worry about the danger of new item being delivered which will hindrance the business execution. There are numerous items can replace the firm items and administrations. Serious contention The opposition is very high, on the grounds that the expansion of the business is high and the quantity of competition in the business is expanding because of the rewarding benefit which will make more hazard GE. The fundamental contenders of the firm are Siemens AG and Emerson Electric. Since they are driving broadened firm just as General Electric.

Should You Send the 4 Free SAT Score Reports

Should You Send the 4 Free SAT Score Reports SAT/ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips Not many things in life are free †particularly with regards to school affirmations. You need to dish out for prep books, test charges, application expenses, and then some. It includes rapidly! So doesn’t it make sense to set aside cash where you can, as on those four free score reports that accompany your SAT enrollment? Perhaps †or possibly not. We will analyze the issue inside and out and assist you with figuring out how to set aside your cash and furthermore amplify your school confirmation possibilities. Why Students Often Send the 4SAT Reports At the point when you register for the SAT, you have the alternative of picking four universities for your score report to be sent to, complimentary. You even have until 9 days after the test to include or change the universities. Scores ordinarily cost $11.25 per school to send, so you’re sparing yourself $45 dollars. Numerous understudies feel free to send the four free score reports. It’s free, so it appears as though there isn't a lot to lose. In addition, you need to send your scores in the end, so why not do it when it’s free? Besides, a few understudies think it shows enthusiasm for a school to pick them as a score beneficiary. It may likewise rouse an understudy to concentrate hard on the off chance that they realize their scores are being sent directly to their top-decision schools. With everything taken into account, it appears to be an entirely decent choice, isn't that so? All things considered, that all relies upon which schools you pick. Reasons Sending the Reports Could Be a Bad Idea While you positively can set aside cash by sending the four free score reports, there are a few dangers that accompany utilizing them. Above all else, it’s worth explaining you’re not getting any sort of an advantage in the school application process by sending scores early †universities don’t monitor or favor understudies who started their applications before or speak with the affirmations office in any capacity. The general quality of your application matters most, not when you start it. â€Å"Your finished application is all the exhibited intrigue we need. We don’t track visits, interchanges, school fairs, or web occasions to improve or diminish anyone’s application, says Dartmouth College on their confirmations site. Stanford University says the equivalent thing:We know by the very certainty of your applying that you are truly inspired by Stanford. We don't track forthcoming understudy contacts with our office. Primary concern, the quality of your general application is the thing that issues to schools. Furthermore, an enormous piece of your application will be the grades you send. Which is the reason the score reports can be a hazard. The free score reports are sent naturally after your test is scored †you can’t take them back on the off chance that you take a gander at your scores and they’re lower than you needed. This implies a school you may truly need to go to currently has your not exactly heavenly score. Except if you want to pursue down a mail truck and taking back your scores... This will nullify utilizing Score Choice (picking your top SAT scores from different sittings) at any school you send the free score reports to. This is a hazardous move, particularly on the off chance that you send your scores to serious schools. In addition, there are numerous reasons why the four free score reports probably won't be as useful as you might suspect. You probably won't wind up applying to every one of the four schools you list, particularly if you’re accepting the test as a sophomore or in junior fall. Most students’ school records vacillate much through the span of secondary school. While you're not squandering cash in the event that you don't wind up applying to the four schools you send your scores to, it demonstrates how those four reports are not really supportive. Besides, in the event that you retake the SAT, except if you pick precisely the same four schools, you’ll need to re-send any new reports in the event that you get a higher score the subsequent time. So except if there are four schools you’re positive you’re going to apply to and you’re not stressed sending lower scores will hurt your confirmation risks, the four free score reports can be a hazard. While you can conceivably set aside cash by exploiting the free reports, you should be cautious about which schools you pick. We will examine two potential approaches to get around this beneath. Our Strategy For the Free Score Reports While we wouldn’t instruct you to never send the score reports, as it very well may be a cost-sparing choice, there is an approach to be keen about it. Find out about the two best alternatives beneath †not sending the score reports at all or sending them just to your wellbeing schools or â€Å"all scores† schools. Choice 1: Don't Sent Any Reports This is the best way to be certain you won't coincidentally send poor SAT scores to a school you're keen on. Not sending any score reports permits you to unwind and concentrate on the test. You’re the one in particular who will see your scores until further notice. On the off chance that you have to retake it, you’ll retake it. You don’t need to worry about a school seeing your scores right away. Moreover, not sending scores can be savvy in light of the fact that you’re likely not going to settle your application list until senior fall. It’s difficult to anticipate where precisely you’re applying as a sophomore or junior when you take the SAT. Indeed, the main schools you may make certain about are your fantasy or â€Å"reach† schools, accurately the schools you don’t need to send scores to dazzle. While you may wind up paying more for score reports not far off, you might be sending the scores you need to send to the universities you need to apply to. By keeping your school application list reasonable, you can get a good deal on score reports and application expenses. Choice 2: Send the Reports to Safety and All Scores Schools On the off chance that you truly need to exploit those score reports, send them to your security schools †ones you are genuinely certain you will apply to and you know you won’t experience difficulty getting into. Or on the other hand send them to any schools you’re inspired by that require all scores in any case. Yale is one of numerous schools that require your total testing record to be sent. By sending scores to wellbeing schools, regardless of whether your score is lower than anticipated, you’re likely not harming your odds of confirmation. Furthermore, regardless of whether your scores are lower than anticipated and they go to all scores schools, that would happen in any case, regardless of whether you didn't send the reports for nothing. Thusly, you can set aside some cash down the line whenever you’re applying to school without risking your odds of confirmation at serious schools that acknowledge Score Choice. The most effective method to Request Free Waivers for More Score Reports Numerous understudies today apply to multiple schools, which means sending in excess of four score reports. On the off chance that sending extra SAT scores presents a budgetary hardship for your family, you can get four more as a feature of a charge waiver from College Board. (The charge waiver additionally permits you to take the SAT twice for nothing, just as two SAT Subject Tests.) Your secondary school guide needs to demand the expense falter, so make a meeting with them as quickly as time permits to start the procedure. This will take the strain to send the four score reports in light of the fact that they’re free. Different Tips for Keeping Costs Down Ensure you settle your school application list right off the bat in senior fall and give yourself a lot of time to send scores so you don’t need to pay the additional surge conveyance expense. This is an approach to keep application costs down, also your feelings of anxiety! Likewise, you shouldn’t be applying to an excessively extensive rundown of schools. Those application charges and score-sending expenses will include rapidly. Attempt to hold your rundown to 10 or less, and with a blend of wellbeing schools, likely schools, and arrive at schools. At last, cautiously inquire about score decision versus all scores schools. On the off chance that you are for the most part applying to schools that acknowledge Score Choice, you will have the choice to just send your best SAT scores. Don’t discard that opportunity by sending SAT scores before you’ve seen them yourself. What’s Next? So what sort of SAT score would it be a good idea for you to focus on? Utilize our manual for make an objective score dependent on your top-decision schools. Not certain on the off chance that you should retake the SAT? We have a manual for help you choose. Need some assistance preparing for the SAT? Figure out how to quit using up all available time on the Math area, how to peruse the entries in Critical Reading, and the syntax rules you should know for the composing segment. Need to improve your SAT score by 160 points?We've composed a guide about the main 5 procedures you should use to have a taken shots at improving your score. Download it with the expectation of complimentary at this point:

Sensuality Versus Heroism essays

Sexiness Versus Heroism articles In the mid fifteenth century, craftsman Donatello shaped a male bare in bronze, David, utilizing Classical goals. Toward the finish of the fifteenth century this model was deciphered by another craftsman, Andrea Del Verrocchio. While the two figures depict David standing over the head of Goliath, this is the place the similitudes end. These two renditions of the scriptural subject are very different in the manner David is depicted, his clothing, just as the by and large inclination conjured from the two models. Verrocchio and Donatello both show David remaining over the leader of the killed Goliath. Donatello's David depicts him as an erotic figure instead of a legend. His blade is pointed descending close by, and his look also will be additionally descending. This makes it look as though he is modest about his triumph. Verrocchio's David, then again, depicts him as a legend, valiantly remaining over the head of Goliath. His blade is pointed outward r instead of down, making it look as though he is as yet prepared to fight. His look is additionally up and he The two craftsman's disparities in clothing on the two models additionally varies. Donatello leaves his model of David bare aside from a cap and boots. The pieces of clothing are barely recognizable because of the way that they are a delicate and engaging. Verrochio's David, nonetheless, is dressed in clothing reasonable for the fight to come. His piece of clothing is by all accounts that of a warrior The general inclination summoned from the two figures is the last contrast between the two. Donatello's David conjures a sentiment of arousing quality and class in not just the way David is presented, yet additionally in his peaceful facial highlights. Verrochio's David, interestingly, conjures a sentiment of valor just as untainted suggestions. His highlights are increasingly innocent Donatello's utilization of clothing, the manner in which David is depicted, just as the sen ... <!

Tips on How to Find College Essay Prompts

Tips on How to Find College Essay PromptsThere are some tricks of the trade that allow you to understand how to find college essay prompts in a way that helps you excel at college writing. Writing an essay is an integral part of a successful education. Even in our higher education system, colleges and universities are increasingly looking to their applicants to write them in a concise and effective manner.As a result, each school's standards have come down to better focus on writing skills. It is no wonder that some students simply give up on essays because they simply lack the time to put into them. The trick, however, is to understand how to find college essay prompts that will help you not only get past the first round of challenges but also make the process of writing that essay easy for you.If you are beginning to think that there is no way you will be able to keep up with the demands of your college life, you are mistaken. If you stay motivated, you will be able to graduate fro m college without having to resort to essay help. That being said, if you have started to write an essay and do not know where to start, a quick internet search will take you to a number of websites that offer essay assistance.While these various websites do charge money for their services, the fee is much less than the fees you would incur when you were in college. You will be well-served by the time and money you save by using the web to gather information on college essay prompts and guide you through the writing process. However, there are a few things you should do before you sign up for a course.First, be sure to visit a number of different college essay prompts. In fact, it is wise to do this on your own to avoid any temptation to cheat the system. It is very easy to cheat a system, especially one as professional as an essay prompt. College counselors are trained to spot such cheating and will not hesitate to pass you over for a student who is truly committed to getting good grades.Second, spend the time to become familiar with the tools that you will need. You want to become an expert in writing essays, no matter what level of study you have reached. You can benefit from an extensive amount of information on writing a great essay. The internet has made writing online easier than ever before, and you can use the knowledge you gain to reach your goal of improving your writing skills.Last, do not forget to apply yourself. Even if you have read dozens of guides on essay writing, you should take the time to write as many essays as you can throughout your college career. Once you begin to master writing essays, you will begin to appreciate how to find college essay prompts that will give you confidence as you pursue your goals.Do not allow yourself to get intimidated by the amount of work required to succeed in college life. Anyone who has ever worked hard knows that it is worth the effort. While it may take some time to find that perfect essay, doing so wil l not be a waste of time.

Gun Control in the United States - Free Essay Example

Gun Control in the United States In the year 2018 there have been 307 mass shootings around the United States. To put this into perspective, we are 312 days into the year, meaning the US has had nearly as many mass shootings as days in 2018, says Melia Robinson, Skye Gould and Samantha Lee from Business Insider. A more effective screening process for purchasing a weapon needs to be put in place to help prevent unsafe people from owning guns. Federal agencies do not have full knowledge of who is getting a background check to obtain a firearm due to a large portion of the United States that is not voluntarily providing background check information to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. Reporting information to federal agencies is optional, federal law does not require states to submit information to NICS; participation is strictly voluntary (Giffords Law Center). The way that the national and state firearm regulations are now needs to be addressed so that there is no longer a lack of background check information on a national basis. Information that would prohibit an unsafe person, even with a mental illness or disability, from purchasing a firearm is not voluntarily reported. A state does not have to report this information to make it known nationally and those documents will not be able to stop an unsafe person from passing a background check in another state if they choose to purchase elsewhere. These documents are not accessible because some states believe it is a privacy problem giving out a persons medical records. Providing this information to the NICS only gives out a persons name, date of birth and information about their mental state that is vague. No clinical information is given to the NICS, only enough information to identify the person and that persons problem that is preventing them from owning a firearm. Confidentiality still exists between a person and their health care professional. Another reason this is a problem is if someone wants to purchase a firearm in another state, they are able to do so by providing dishonest information when filling out a background check. There are currently no laws preventing this from happening. Since the last elections in 2010, as a result of the 2010 midterm elections, the rise of the Tea Party, and the subsequent reapportionment of state legislative districts, the balance of power in a number of state legislatures significantly shifted to conservatives opposed to firearms regulation and federal authority. (William 885). The year 2020 is the next time state legislative reapportionment will occur. There are currently four states that require a mental health screening along with their background checks and they are choosing not to report these documents to the NICS. Arkansas, Michigan, Ohio and Utah are the states that are participating in this and these states do not address disclosure to the NICS. Colorado, Florida, Nebraska, Missouri, Pennsylvania and West Virginia are not required to disclose to the NICS even though it is authorized. Time periods for reporting mental health records range from immediately to one month. Some states are required to report mental health records upon order from a court or in a timely manner. There is too much leeway in the urgency of reporting these documents. Changes that need to be made in the United States are not able to happen until the year 2020. If we can implement a screening process that involves federal agencies having complete access to all background check information in the United States, there will be less room for individuals to slip through the cracks. There of course have been an overwhelming amount of shootings that have been committed solely because of mental health of the assailant at the time of the incident. The United States has put mental health on the backburner in the recent years due to budget cuts and federal funding. In 2015, mental health care had taken an approximate $4.35 billion cut from their budgets. Reduction of these services could further link to more mass shootings with these ill persons readily having access to firearms. The state legislatures need to start incorporating resources to be available to the mentally ill. Raising awareness and educating the public could significantly help to reduce the possibility of these violent crimes. With the negative stigma that goes along with mental health, these people need serious medical help and should not be ridiculed for such thing. Having such resources or education available community wide would greatly help the chance of recovery. Putting forth effort, resources, and public education towards mental illness could begin efforts to alleviate the negative connotation and begin to get help to those in need before another eruption involving gun violence happens. Although mental healthcare is not a profitable branch of medicine, the bottom line is these people need help. The perpetrator receiving treatment in a timely and effective manner would help to prevent future violent crimes, whereas these behaviors and illnesses being ignored could lead to many more mass shootings. As a mother, its dismaying to realize children are no longer safe anywhere, under parental supervision or not. Places once thought of as excitement, such as a movie theater, shopping mall, school, church, etc. have all become places of mass gun violence. One step at time, the United States needs to start making strides to protect those children that will become our future. With the amount of mass shootings going on around the United States we need to bind together and rally around making a safe place to live. Without trial and error there is no true way to know what could help impact safety around dangerous individuals getting their hands on firearms. There should be a desire to enforce stricter laws to prevent those who have mental illnesses, those who have perpetrated domestic or animal abuse, and individuals with drug or alcohol charges from purchasing a deadly weapon. The gun violence restraining order (GVRO) has been trialed in California since 2014. California is the first state in the US to trial this new law and hopes to have more states follow their lead in the near future. This law gives the right to any spouse, whether by marriage or not, domestic partner, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly resides in the household (Frattaroli, Shannon) to file a GVRO after noting or observing behaviors in which potentially dangerous behaviors have been or are being exhibited. This complaint is filed through the civil justice system and a petition will be filled to remove these weapons from the charged person(s) by law enforcement. There are also rules set in place on how someone can go through the motions and make the right steps into possibly receiving their firearms back with lengthy psychiatric help or anger management style courses. This is a temporary restraint and does not conclude the named individual has committed a crime. While this law is not bulletproof, it does give guidance to hose surrounding a potentially dangerous individual a place to make their claims and have them heard. It happens all too often after these mass shootings that the family/friends note the shooter had been displaying some odd or dangerous behaviors beforehand but they chose to look the other direction because there was nowhere to report to. If even a small percentage of those shooters could have been investigated, that would be a win for society. The United States should adopt greater mental health screening to obtain a gun, just as other countries have done and have been successful. Many other countries around the globe have a mandatory mental health screening to be able to purchase a firearm. Found in the article written by Audrey Carlsen and Sahil Chinoy are the processes in which a citizen of a specific country must to do to obtain a firearm. If the United States were to follow the footsteps of some of these other countries, a great number of the mass shootings we have experienced may have been easily prevented. By looking at the different processes, many other countries have strict rules as to how to obtain a firearm, and that includes psychological tests and mental health screening. In the US, the process is extremely easy and takes almost no time at all. All that is needed to purchase a gun, according to the article written by Carlsen and Chinoy, is to pass an instant background check. Most states do require an extended background check but even with that step the process is not nearly as extensive and thorough as a lot of other countries. One country that this article talks about is Japan, which has one of the longest gun-purchasing processes. The second step in the process, again according to the article written by Carlsen and Chinoy, is to receive a note from your doctor that says that you are mentally fit to own a gun and have no signs of drug abuse. Japan makes sure that the person purchasing a firearm is in stable condition and shows no harm to themselves or others. The United States needs to make a change in how easily Americans can buy or obtain guns, and one way to do this is by adding additional mental health screening to the requirements to purchase a gun. Some people believe that mental illness has nothing to do with the mass shootings that we are experiencing as a country and that making the process to obtain a gun longer wont help. There are a lot of articles that talk about whether there is any correlation between mass shootings and mental illness, and a lot of these articles say that there are no connections between the two. People believe that the media blames mental illness to give citizens something to blame for these terrible incidents. An article by Rachel Nuwer titled Is There a Link Between Mass Shootings and Mental Illness? talks about how many mass killers have mental illness. According to Nuwers research, a 2004 study found that out of more than 60 mass murders, only 6% were mentally ill and the people that commit mass shootings account for less than 1% of the gun-related homicides. Nuwer uses a quote in her article from a professor and director of psychiatric and law program at the University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, Renee Binder. Binger says, When one of these horrible mass shootings occurs, people say Anyone who would do such a thing must be mentally ill. Binger then goes on to say that we need to be careful while using the term mentally ill because often the individual may have something wrong, but they arent technically mentally ill. As all these ideas make sense and seem right, often, mental illnesses go undetected and undiagnosed, so it is difficult to say that mental illness does play a role or not. The United States still needs to ensure that everyone buying a gun, of any kind, are in the right mind and capable of handling a firearm in the right ways. There are many solutions to this enormous problem we face in the US. These three following organizations explain ways to reduce or prevent gun violence. The Prevention Institute organization has 14 different ways they recommend the preventions of gun violence. They divided them into four different subgroups including gun safety: reduce the imminent risk of lethality though sensible gun laws and a culture of safety, the underlying contributors to gun violence: systematically reduce risks and increase resilience in individuals, families, and communities, the prevention infrastructure: ensure effectiveness and sustainability of efforts, and lastly new frontiers: continue to learn, innovate, and increase impact through research and practice. This website has three phone numbers for contacting them. Their main office in Oakland, CA (510-444-7738), Los Angeles, CA (323294-4527), and one in Washington, D.C. (202-747-3496). They also added a list of 20 other organizations that talk about gun violence prevention that they found helpful. Adopting other countries ways of gun control. The Dave Kopel organization explains the ways of Canadas gun laws. Canada for instance has a uniform federal firearms control system that, while stricter than the controls in the United States overall, is more lenient than some American jurisdictions. Back in 1974 there was an incident with two young boys that ran around with rifles in a public school, the Canadian government quickly responded with stricter gun control by passing a new law in 1977 that required all prospective gun purchasers to receive a police approval and have two-character references. They have a phone number (303-279-6536) and an email address ([emailprotected]) for any comments or questions. There has also been talk of having teachers being armed in schools for protection. The Action Network organization talks about the SB 383 bill. Part of the bill states that this bill would allow school personnel to have access to firearms in school safety zones if they receive authorization from the school board of directors, are licensed to carry a concealed firearm and have met certain training requirements in the use and handling of firearms. This legislation will not mandate a schools participation but will give school boards the ability to establish policy and put in place protocols needed to enable personnel to exercise their ability to access a firearm on designated school property. (action network)This is an interesting way of preventing school shootings. However, school shootings are all that would protect against with this new bill. Statistically speaking school shooting are less likely to happen in comparison to other kinds of mass shootings. This website has an email address ([emailprotected]) for the public to send their comments and questions to. These three organizations explain ways of preventing mass shootings. With a more effective screening process preventing unsafe people from owning a firearm, mass shootings in the United States will hopefully come to an end. Adopting mental health screening as part of the background check requirements will help make gun control more effective in the United States. This approach on gun control and proof of other countries having success with a more in depth background check give us hope for change. More effective methods should be implemented and should stop being ignored. Our voice will not be heard unless we all can come together as a nation to make that voice louder. Any form of participation to make these changes is a step in the right direction for a safer country. These changes could help save the lives of many in the United States. Works Cited Carlsen, Audrey, and Sahil Chinoy. How to Buy a Gun in 15 Countries. The New York Times, The New York Times, 2 Mar. 2018, www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/03/02/world/international-gun-laws.html. Frattaroli, Shannon. Gun Violence Restraining Orders: Alternative or Adjunct to Mental Health-Based Restrictions on Firearms? Behavioral Sciences the Law, vol. 33, no. 2/3, June 2015, pp. 290â€Å"307. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1002/bsl.2173. Prevention Institution Gun Violence Must Stop. Heres What We Can Do to Prevent More Deaths. Prevention Institute, 2018, www.preventioninstitute.org/focus-areas/preventing-violence-and-reducing-injury/preventing-vi olence-advocacy. Kopel, David. Canadian Gun Control: The Brady Bill Comes Due: The Printz Case and State Autonomy, 2018, davekopel.org/2A/LawRev/Canadian_Gun_Control.htm. Metzl, Johnathan M, and Kenneth T MacLeish. Mental Illness, Mass Shootings, and the Politics of American Firearms. National Library of Medicine and Health, Feb. 2015, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318286/. Nuwer, Rachel. Future Is There a Link between Mass Shootings and Mental Illness? BBC News, BBC, 10 May 2018, www.bbc.com/future/story/20180509-is-there-a-link-between-mass-shooting-and-mental-illness. Robinson, Melia, et al. There Have Been 307 Mass Shootings in the US so Far in 2018 Heres the Full List. Business Insider, Business Insider, 8 Nov. 2018, www.businessinsider.com/how-many-mass-shootings-in-america-this-year-2018-2. Toohill, Kathleen. Mental Health Reporting. Edited by Brittany Neito and Kelly Drane, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, https://lawcenter.giffords.org/gun-laws/policy-areas/background-checks/mental-health-reporting/ Vizzard, William J. The Current And Future State Of Gun Policy In The United States. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Vol. 105. Issue 4 (Fall 2015): 879-904. Web. 18 November 2018. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7541context=jclc Wolf, Carolyn Reinach, and Jamie A. Rosen. Missing the Mark: Gun Control Is Not the Cure for What Ails the U.S. Mental Health System. Journal of Criminal Law Criminology, vol. 104, no. 4, Fall 2015, pp. 851â€Å"878. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=truedb=aphAN=110668172site=ehost-live