Musculinity and drinking

1. Does the study meet the scientific requirements?It slewnot be denied that scientific study has become of great immenseness to any profession. Every whizz is aware of the event that knowledge is increased through study and that critique of that study can also provide a basis for improving the study practices.This study, The Glass fellow member Pub (lic) masculinity and Drinking in Rural New Zealand by Hugh Campbell meet the scientific requirements as it involved an intensifier analysis of a particular spot.2. Is it a research study?Moreover, it is a scientific study utilizing the ethnographicalal fieldwork research systems. Ethnographic research or fieldwork is considered an essential part of the training towards becoming a sociable scientist such that it is said to play a role in consciousness raising by extending wizards view of the world and challenging ones assumptions about the nature of things (Robson, 1993). Through ethnographic research the fieldworker gains an appreciation of the diversity and complexity of the human social condition and, at the same time, of the ultimate unity of human-kind.3. Is it a quantitative study?No, it is not a quantitative study since it did not lend oneself any notation system. It must be noted that quantitative researchers deputize numbers to observations and produce information by counting and measuring things. Further, this study did not use any counting and measuring of things.4. Is it a qualitative study?Yes, this is a qualitative study since the researcher did not make counts or assign numbers to his observations. But rather, the researcher gain access into the life-world of his subjects and male groups that is, to discover their motivations, their sources of meaning, their emotions and other subjective aspects of their lives because it is simply in doing so that a researcher will be able to see, to describe, and to understand human deportment and social phenomena with greater depth. In addition, the researcher employed a qualitative research rule which is participatory ethnographic fieldwork (p.262)5. Is it clearly written?Yes, it is clearly written as the researcher utilise the first person and based on his experiences and analysis6. Assess the title.The title is somewhat vague though as the author utilise a metaphor and one may not be totally familiar with The Glass Phallus. So, one has to read the article thoroughly first before understanding the meaning behind the title.7. Assess the authors affiliations.Not some(prenominal) of the authors affiliations were included in the study except that he has lived in the research area or club for five historic period as this is a participatory ethnographic fieldwork (p.262)8. Assess the abstract.The abstract is clearly declared and includes the necessary things to include in an abstract such as the subjects and locale of the study, plan of the study, the results, and the conclusion.9. Assess the references.The references uti lize were comprehensive and suited to the given study.10. Is there a centrality of purpose between the introduction, method, and results?Yes, more or slight theres a centrality of purpose between the introduction, method, and results. But lesser centrality between introduction and method as the introduction is more of a myth about the agrarian pub, a nostalgic metaphor of yesteryears as described in the introduction. The method and results has more centrality as the author was able to connect the method used which is ethnographic fieldwork to the results of the study which is more qualitative. The results of the study presented are ethnographic information which are the crossing of systematic and sustained observation.11. Critique the introduction according to the literature reviewThe authors review of literature was conducted and integrated in the discussion part of the article although previous studies were not referred to by specific articles, the names of authors and public ation years were given. Moreover, the literature reported supported the selected qualitative method used in the study. study purposeThis study, The Glass Phallus Pub (lic) Masculinity and Drinking in Rural New Zealand by Hugh Campbell, seed the various slipway in which pubs operate as a social site, where male power is constructed in awkward communities. Another is to examine the way in which symbolic notions of rurality are integral to the construction of gendered power in rural space.12. Critiques the Method according to the sample selectionThe sample of the study population was large (150-200) men who worked in grow service industries, were farm workers, owned or managed small farm service firms, or (a minority) were bachelor farmers. manual(a) laborers on farms and in the farm service industries constituted the majority, just now men from the agricultural petite middle class also were presented consistently.The participant sample selected basically on their performance kno wn as the after-work alcoholism session. The blase parameters of after-work drinking strongly influenced which local men could join the pub (lic) performance of masculinity. In addition to the fact that this study was the result of two periods of fieldwork within 5 years of ethnographic research, all the above mentioned criteria achieved the info saturation required. the study designA participatory ethnographic study using bollock and informal interviews was conducted to frame the design of the study (p.262). The method used was appropriate for this study as it sought to examine the various ways in which pubs operate as a social site, where male power is constructed in rural communities. as well as to examine the way in which symbolic notions of rurality are integral to the construction of gendered power in rural space.In addition, the qualitative interviews were undertaken to understand the experiences and all that they entail. data collection proceduresData collection procedu re used which was formal and informal interviews and were consistent with the purpose of the study since the study was a qualitative. Moreover, 200 hours of participatory ethnographic fieldwork (in the pubs), make an even greater abundance of informal discussion and dialogue with members of the community. researchers roleThe researchers role is to conduct interviews (formal or informal) using the participatory ethnographic fieldwork. the issue of timeThis study was done for some 5 years of living in the community. The researcher has done interviews and discussions not just in the pubs but also in various locales such as sports clubs, churches, and voluntary organizations, and in the subjects workplace. materials/instruments usedThe strategies and tools involved in data collection includes ethnographic audiotaped interviews which includes open-ended, broad grand tour questions followed by more focused and in-depth discussions participant observations were conducted in a variety of p laces photography was extensive.13. Critique the Results according to findingsAnalysis from data obtained revealed two major characteristics of pub drinking performance, which are the confabulational cockfighting and the disciplines of drinking. These two combine to ensure that a particular version of masculinity, here called pub(lic) masculinity reproduce itself. A further finding is that masculinity in this kind of performative situation develops a full stop of invisibility. tables, graphs or chartsNo tables, graphs, or charts were included in the study. statistical data and tests usedNo statistical data or tests were used as this is a qualitative study. So no sample data were given. Only some conversation or descriptive data were presented.-discussionThe discussion of the result was done comprehensively and thus thoroughly-limitationsThe researcher know the difficulties of analyzing an invisible masculinity and argues that rendering masculinity is an important task for any soc iological analysis of some(prenominal) public leisure sites in rural society.-implications The significant implication of this study is that rural sociologists must represent quickly beyond viewing rural pub as just another aspect of the rural idyll but it is more of the operation of gendered power in rural communities, and as a site where rural masculinities are enacted and defended.ReferenceRobson, C. (1993) Real World Research A Resource for Social Scientists andPractitioner-Researchers. Blackwell.